MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416505020 · doi:10.1186/s12966-025-01842-4

Primary school-based food environment intervention increases diet diversity: Project Daire, a cluster randomized controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4416505020 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dilara Olgacher, Sarah Brennan, Fiona Lavelle, Sarah E. Moore, Michelle C. McKinley, Patrick McCole, Ruth F. Hunter, Laura Dunne, Chris R. Cardwell, Danielle McCarthy, Jayne V. Woodside

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQueen's UniversityQueen's University Belfast
KeywordsClinical nutritionCluster randomised controlled trialIntervention (counseling)Dietary diversityRandomized controlled trialFood groupCluster (spacecraft)Diversity (politics)Food frequency questionnairePublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: This study explored the effects of Project Daire, a school-based food intervention, on secondary dietary outcomes Diet Diversity Score (DDS) and Diet Quality Score (DQS), among 6–7 and 10-11-year-old children. METHODS: A randomised-controlled, factorial design trial was conducted in 15 Northern Ireland primary schools across four intervention arms: Nourish, Engage, Nourish and Engage, and Control (Delayed). Nourish modified the school food environment and increased exposure to local foods, while Engage delivered educational activities on nutrition, food, and agriculture. Food consumption data were collected at baseline and at up to a 6-month follow-up. DDS and DQS (at home, at school and/or total) were determined based on the UK Eatwell Guide. RESULTS: A total of 445 children aged 6–7 and 458 aged 10–11 completed the trial. Among the 10-11-year-olds who received the Nourish intervention, significant increases were observed in the school DDS (adjusted mean difference = 2.79, 95% CI: 1.44–4.14; p < 0.001) and total DDS (adjusted mean difference = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.65–2.44; p = 0.001) compared to their counterparts who did not receive it. No such changes were observed in the DDS of 6-7-year-olds in the Nourish group, nor in either age group receiving the Engage intervention. The DQS of both age groups remained unchanged across all intervention groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Nourish intervention was associated with improved dietary diversity among older children through modifications to the whole-school environment. However, the absence of measurable effects on diet quality highlights the need for future iterations of Project Daire to incorporate additional strategies. These should include targeted approaches to improve diet quality, foster active parental engagement, utilize validated dietary assessment tools, and ensure sustained implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04277312.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical ActivitySame topicObesity, Physical Activity, DietFrench-language works237,207