MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416510166 · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109947

Estimation of soil hydraulic parameters for fine-textured soils using HYDRUS-1D coupled with PEST

2025· article· en· W4416510166 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ishmeet Kaur, Afua Adobea Mante, Ramanathan Sri Ranjan, Francis Zvomuya, Kayla Moore, Kurt Gottfried, Taras E. Lychuk

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultural Water Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of ManitobaGovernment of Manitoba
KeywordsSoil waterHydraulic conductivityCalibrationStandard deviationHydrology (agriculture)Coefficient of variationCoefficient of determinationMean squared error

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developing strategies for agricultural water management requires robust evaluation of soil hydraulic parameters. In this study, HYDRUS-1D coupled with Parameter ESTimation (PEST) software was used to estimate the van-Genuchten-Mualem soil hydraulic parameters for a fine-textured soil in the Carman-Elm Creek area, Manitoba, Canada over four growing seasons (2016 – 2019). 100 initial parameter sets were generated per season for calibration using field-measured volumetric soil water content within the 0 – 10 cm, 10 – 30 cm, 30 – 70 cm, and 70 – 130 cm soil layers. Coupling HYDRUS-1D with PEST revealed the non-uniqueness of the solutions, as multiple parameter sets yielded comparable model performance. Sequential calibrations with randomized initial parameter sets and performance-based filtering helped to identify stable, maximum-likelihood parameter ranges. Model performance based on the Nash-Sutcliff efficiency coefficient (0.65 – 0.92), percent bias (-9.31 % - 1.48 %), ratio of root mean square error to standard deviation (0.29–0.59), and the coefficient of determination (0.68 – 0.96) was satisfactory for all seasons except for the validation for 2018 due to high variability between calibration and validation periods within the 2018 season. The saturated hydraulic conductivity showed substantial year-to-year variation (120, 10, 21, and 120 cm day −1 for 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively) within the top 10 cm layer and remained relatively stable (< 20 cm day −1 ) in deeper layers. These findings underscore the importance of accounting for soil-plant-weather interactions when characterizing soil hydraulic parameters to improve agricultural water management strategies and support adaptation in cold-climate cropping systems. • HYDRUS-1D coupled with PEST sufficiently estimated soil hydraulic parameters in a fine-textured soil in Manitoba. • Maximum likelihood parameter ranges improved the accuracy of hydraulic parameter estimation. • Intra- and inter-season conditions cause deviation from the forcing conditions under which the model was initially calibrated. • Saturated hydraulic conductivity values showed significant year-to-year variation in the top 0 – 10 cm layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricultural Water ManagementSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207