MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416524434 · doi:10.1016/j.psj.2025.106145

Determining methionine and cysteine requirements of male and female Ross 708 broilers exposed to heat stress during the finisher period

2025· article· en· W4416524434 on OpenAlexafffund
Dilshaan Duhra, A. D. Beaulieu, T. Shynkaruk, Juliano César de Paula Dorigam, Rose Whelan, K. Schwean-Lardner

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChicken Farmers of SaskatchewanUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsMethionineHeat stressStarterBroilerDigBasal (medicine)CysteineRelative humidity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to determine standard ileal digestible methionine and cysteine (dig Met+Cys) requirements of broilers reared under cyclic heat stress conditions. A basal diet deficient in dig Met+Cys was used as a control (0.254 % dig Met, 0.240 % dig Cys), and supplemented with DL-Methionine at 5 graded levels (0.050, 0.090, 0.170, 0.290, and 0.450 %), replacing silicon dioxide for six treatments containing 0.494, 0.541, 0.588, 0.648, 0.738, and 0.837 % dig Met+Cys, was fed from d 20 to 33. Day-old Ross 708 chicks were sex separated and housed in nine rooms (five male, four female), each containing 6 trial pens. From d 27 to 33, the birds were exposed to cyclical heat stress, alternating between a 12-h exposure to 31 °C and a 12-h cool period of 21 °C (minimum humidity 50 %; humidex of 41 °C and 23 °C). Body and feed weights were measured on d 0, 20, 27, and 33. On d 31, 1 bird per pen was euthanized and had a breast and liver sample taken to measure biomarkers for oxidative damage and antioxidant capacity. On d 34, 3 birds per pen were slaughtered and used to measure meat yield. Data were analyzed as a one-way ANOVA using the MIXED procedure in SAS and using an exponential regression model to determine requirements. Increasing dietary dig Met+Cys significantly improved BW gain and feed-to-gain (F:G). The estimated required dig Met+Cys intake to maximize BW gain and F:G for males were 0.976 g/d and 1.116 g/d, respectively, and 1.031 g/d for females for both parameters. No significant effects of dig Met+Cys level on antioxidant activity were observed. Requirements for maximal Pectoralis major yields were approximately 0.808 and 0.726 g/d dig Met+Cys intake for males and females, respectively. Based on F:G response, a daily intake of dig Met+Cys of 1.116 g (males) and 1.031 g (females) for Ross 708 broilers under cyclical heat stress conditions of 31 °C and 21 °C from d 27 to 33 is required, while meeting needs for optimal BWG and meat yield.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207