Betamethasone and Triamcinolone Acetonide Have Comparable Efficacy as Single Intra-Articular Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid injections are commonly used for pain relief and improved function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, the optimal corticosteroid preparation remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of single-shot long-acting corticosteroid (betamethasone) and intermediate-acting corticosteroid (triamcinolone acetonide) injections in knee OA. METHODS: This single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial included 120 patients with symptomatic knee OA who were randomized to receive either a betamethasone (7-mg) or triamcinolone acetonide (40-mg) IA injection and were followed for 6 months. The primary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (0 to 100) at rest and during movement at 6 months. The secondary outcomes were the VAS pain during movement, knee flexion angle, modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, Timed Up-and-Go test (TUG), 2-minute walk test (2MWT), and side effects. The analysis focused on between-group comparisons using multilevel regression models. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 120 Thai individuals. Both the betamethasone and triamcinolone groups demonstrated significant reductions in VAS pain at rest starting from day 1 and lasting for up to 6 months. At 6 months, the between-group mean difference in VAS pain at rest was -1 (95% confidence interval [CI], -11 to 8; p = 0.77), indicating no significant difference. Similarly, at 6 months, no significant between-group differences were observed in VAS pain during movement (-3 [95% CI, -13 to 7]; p = 0.51), flexion angle (6 [95% CI, 1 to 10]; p = 0.20), WOMAC score (-4 [95% CI, -11 to 4]; p = 0.91), UCLA activity score (0 [95% CI, -0.5 to 0.6]; p = 0.46), TUG (-1 second [95% CI, -3 to 1]; p = 0.88), or 2MWT (9 meters [95% CI, -1 to 19]; p = 0.47). Acetaminophen and tramadol use were numerically, but not significantly, lower in the betamethasone group (p > 0.05). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed between IA betamethasone and triamcinolone acetonide with respect to VAS pain, functional scores, or performance-based outcomes at 6 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".