MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416530330 · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/ae228a

A dynamic spatial-temporal graph transformer with multi-frequency attention for remaining useful life prediction

2025· article· W4416530330 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Xia, Hui Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueMeasurement Science and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTransformerModular designAdjacency listFuse (electrical)GraphAttention networkConvolution (computer science)Convolutional neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The remaining useful life (RUL) prediction is essential for cost-effective production and reliable predictive maintenance in intelligent manufacturing. Existing deep learning-based approaches often struggle to capture complex degradation patterns across temporal, spatial, and frequency domains. To address this limitation, a dynamic spatial-temporal graph transformer with multi-frequency attention (DSTGT-MFA) is proposed in this paper for RUL prediction. The proposed DSTGT-MFA model consists of three key components: a multi-scale gated convolutional neural network for extracting hierarchical local features, a graph convolution transformer for modeling long-term spatial-temporal dependencies with dynamic and static adjacency matrices, and a multi-frequency spatial-temporal attention mechanism to enhance temporal and spatial attention in the frequency domain. This integrated architecture enables the model to comprehensively capture degradation trends and fuse multi-domain features. Extensive experiments conducted on the commercial modular aero-propulsion system simulation (CMAPSS) and new CMAPSS datasets demonstrate that the DSTGT-MFA model achieves superior prediction accuracy compared to twelve baseline methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeasurement Science and TechnologySame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207