MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416535598 · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2025.116463

Towards sustainable transformer insulation design: Advances in thermally upgraded kraft and Nomex paper under high thermal stress

2025· article· en· W4416535598 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew Adewunmi Adekunle

Bibliographic record

VenueRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsThermal insulationKraft paperAramidInsulation systemRenewable energyService lifeTransformer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing demand for renewable energy integration and compact transformer designs has intensified thermal and electrical stresses on insulation systems, raising urgent concerns about reliability and sustainability. Thermally upgraded kraft (TUK) paper, though cost-effective, exhibits rapid performance loss under elevated temperature and moisture conditions, which could limit its suitability for long-term service. Aramid-based papers, such as Nomex® 410 and the cellulose–aramid hybrid Nomex® 910, offer superior thermal stability, low moisture uptake, and improved dielectric strength, which position them as sustainable alternatives for high-stress applications. Following this, this review synthesizes recent progress in paper insulation design, which includes hybrid cellulose–aramid, plasma fluorination, and composite engineering, aimed at extending service life while reducing lifecycle costs. Furthermore, comparative analyses of ageing studies demonstrate that aramid-based paper retains greater mechanical integrity, breakdown voltage, and oxidation resistance than TUK. Beyond technical performance, emerging strategies such as recycling aged aramid insulation and adopting circular economy practices underscore the potential for greener transformer manufacturing. Therefore, by integrating advanced material engineering with sustainability principles, this review highlights future directions for insulation design that can ensure reliable, efficient, and environmentally responsible operation of power transformers under high thermal stress. • Comparative review of TUK and aramid insulation under thermal stress. • Nomex papers show superior thermal, dielectric, and mechanical performance. • Surface modification and hybrid structures enhance insulation reliability. • Recycling and nanotechnology open pathways for sustainable insulation. • Review outlines future insulation design for high-demand transformers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsSame topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207