MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416540505 · doi:10.1186/s40352-025-00389-7

Evaluating the association of transferring governance of correctional health care services with overdose and all-cause mortality: a retrospective cohort study in British Columbia, Canada

2025· article· en· W4416540505 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Lisa McQuarrie, Dibbya Pravas Dasgupta, Tonia L. Nicholls, Ruth Elwood Martin, Katherine McLeod, Stuart A. Kinner, Leigh Greiner, Maureen Olley, Kate Roth, Heather Palis, Ashok Krishnamoorthy, Amanda Slaunwhite

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth & Justice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Canadian institutionsMinistry of HealthMcMaster UniversityProvincial Health Services AuthorityCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesBC Centre for Disease ControlGovernment of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPublic healthHealth careRetrospective cohort studyCorporate governanceSocial policyHealth services researchHealth policyAssociation (psychology)Healthcare policyHealth services

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In many jurisdictions world-wide, the government agency that manages prisons also provides prison health care services. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations (UN) have recommended that health ministries provide prison health care. In Canada, the province of British Columbia (BC) transferred responsibility for correctional health services to the health ministry in accordance with this guidance. The objective of this study was to estimate the association between the transfer in BC and all-cause and overdose mortality within 1 year of release from prison. METHODS: We used a retrospective cohort study design employing the difference-in-differences (DiD) method to compare mortality among formerly-incarcerated people in the pre- and post-transfer periods against a matched community control group to control for province-wide trends in mortality. The data source was a longitudinal linkage of administrative databases. The DiD effect was estimated with survival time-to-event models. RESULTS: In the formerly-incarcerated group (N = 6912), all-cause (3.7% vs 2.6%) and overdose (2.7% vs 1.7%) mortality in the first-year post-release decreased from the pre-transfer period to the post-transfer period, while mortality risk changed little in the community control group (N = 6881) during this time period (all-cause: 0.7% vs 0.9%; overdose: 0.4% vs 0.4%). The transfer was associated with statistically significant reductions in the hazards of all-cause mortality (DiD HR: 0.52, 95% CI: [0.32, 0.83]) and overdose mortality (DiD HR: 0.51, 95% CI: [0.26, 0.99]) in the first-year post-release. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides empirical evidence in support of WHO and UN guidance and indicates that the delivery of correctional health services by community health authorities may reduce deaths, particularly overdose deaths, among people released from correctional centres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth & JusticeSame topicCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisFrench-language works237,207