PAIRPEP : Une intervention coconstruite pour soutenir l’intégration de la pair-aidance dans les programmes pour premiers épisodes psychotiques au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ancrée dans un système de santé apprenant, l’intervention PAIRPEP, soutient l’intégration de la pair-aidance et la pair-aidance famille dans les Programmes pour premiers épisodes psychotiques (PPEP). Élaborée selon une démarche de coconstruction avec les parties prenantes concernées pour répondre aux défis d’implantation de la pair-aidance et favoriser sa reconnaissance institutionnelle, l’intervention comprend une formation complémentaire sur la pratique de pair-aidance en PPEP, des séances de mentorat/intervision bimensuelles aux pairs aidants et pairs aidants famille, des séances d’échanges de connaissances en communauté de pratique impliquant diverses parties prenantes, et des outils cliniques/clinico-administratifs pour soutenir leurs interventions et leur intégration au PPEP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".