MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416544980 · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2025.104095

Recursive deep learning with multi-scale attention for energy demand dynamics

2025· article· en· W4416544980 on OpenAlexaff
Mehrnaz Ahmadi, Mehdi Khashei

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Engineering Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMean squared errorResidualRobustness (evolution)Mean absolute percentage errorPerceptronDeep learningArtificial neural networkNoise reduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Fully learnable filters adapt to nonstationary and multi-scale signal dynamics. • Joint training of denoising and modeling enhances end-to-end accuracy and stability. • Entropy-aware gating fuses multi-stage forecasts with uncertainty-based weighting. • Delivers robust energy price forecasting under volatility and regime shifts. • Achieves up to 85% RMSE and 99% MAPE reduction over 50 existing models. Nonstationary and multi-scale time series challenge traditional decomposition-based and denoising techniques. These approaches often rely on fixed transformations or shallow residual modeling, limiting adaptability to evolving dynamics likes energy price forecasting. This work introduces an end-to-end recursive deep learning architecture that preserves the classical estimation loop while rendering all state-space parameters data-adaptive at every stage and time step. The parameters are synthesized by a lightweight neural generator conditioned on recent residual behavior and cross-scale context, enabling reconfiguration as regimes shift. Robustness is ensured through two design choices: a stability-preserving parameterization of state evolution that prevents drift and explosions, and innovation-driven, heteroskedastic noise modeling that automatically adjusts to volatility. At each stage, a trend is extracted, modeled by a shared deep multilayer perceptron (DMLP), and fused through an entropy-aware module that weights stage contributions, yielding a closed loop that progressively removes structure from the residuals. On the WTI crude oil dataset, compared to a baseline DMLP (MAE = 1.879, MAPE = 1.825 %, RMSE = 2.457), the proposed model achieved a 57.1 % reduction in MAE, 56.7 % in MAPE, and 58.0 % in RMSE (MAE = 0.806, MAPE = 0.787 %, RMSE = 1.031). It also outperformed over 50 state-of-the-art models, achieving up to 85 % lower RMSE and over 99 % reduction in MAPE. The framework is compact, reproducible, and suitable for energy-economics analytics under regime shifts and noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Engineering InformaticsSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207