MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416551819 · doi:10.23977/jeis.2025.100212

An Efficient Identity Authentication Mechanism Based on Algebraic Curves and Zero-Knowledge Proofs

2025· article· W4416551819 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electronics and Information Science · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuthentication (law)Mathematical proofOverhead (engineering)ScalabilityIdentity (music)Authentication protocolGas meter proverIdentity management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid development of the digital economy and the Internet of Things, identity authentication in resource-constrained environments faces challenges such as low efficiency and inadequate privacy protection. Addressing the high computational and communication overhead of traditional RSA and ECC authentication mechanisms, this study proposes an efficient identity authentication mechanism (AC-ZKP) based on algebraic curves and non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs (NIZK). This mechanism leverages algebraic curve group operations to achieve lightweight key management and employs zero-knowledge proofs to ensure information concealment and anti-forgery during identity verification. The paper conducts a systematic study across four dimensions: system modeling, algorithm design, security analysis, and performance evaluation. Experimental results demonstrate that while maintaining 128-bit security strength, the AC-ZKP mechanism reduces authentication latency by approximately 44% and communication overhead by about 40%. It also exhibits strong scalability and resistance to attacks, significantly outperforming traditional ECC schemes. These findings provide a viable solution for lightweight, high-security identity authentication in IoT, edge computing, and cross-border data exchange environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.015
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electronics and Information ScienceSame topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207