MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416553080 · doi:10.1609/aaaiss.v7i1.36924

Predicting Glucose Test Ordering in Hospitalized Patients Using Temporal Models of Clinical Context Embeddings

2025· article· W4416553080 on OpenAlexaff
Joud El-Shawa, Elham Bagheri, Amol A. Verma, Yalda Mohsenzadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Canadian institutionsVector Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Test (biology)Random forestTask (project management)Feature (linguistics)Deep learningIdentification (biology)Predictive modelling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The overuse of laboratory tests is a persistent challenge in healthcare, driving unnecessary costs, patient discomfort, and low-value care. Glucose testing, one of the most common diagnostics, exemplifies this issue in hospital settings. We present a deep learning framework that integrates structured and unstructured electronic medical record data to predict whether a glucose test will be ordered in the next AM/PM time bin. Using multi-hospital data from the GEMINI dataset, we combine Long Short-Term Memory models with Clinical BioBERT embeddings to capture both the timing and clinical context of testing. On held-out test data, our best model achieved ROC-AUC of 0.92 and PR-AUC of 0.67, and generalized across sites in leave-one-hospital-out evaluation (ROC-AUC 0.84). Embedding-based models outperformed traditional feature representations, though adding more tests and vitals did not always yield further gains. By contrast, introducing a simple temporal recency cue (bin counter) improved performance. An exploratory regression task for predicting glucose values performed worse, likely due to class imbalance and reliance on forward-filled values; Random Forest achieved R^2 of 0.80 under masked evaluation, indicating a need for more frequent or diverse test data. Predicting laboratory test ordering is the first step toward evaluating the usefulness of laboratory test use and establishes a foundation for future real-time decision support to reduce unnecessary lab use in hospitals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the AAAI Symposium SeriesSame topicHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsFrench-language works237,207