MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416566562 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2025.11.026

Fluctuating Atrial Thrombus and Failure of Direct Oral Anticoagulation in Severe Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis

2025· article· en· W4416566562 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Michael-Roy R Durr, Nicolas Santi, Nadine Gauthier, Ian G. Burwash, Luc Beauchesne, David Messika–Zeitoun

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtrial fibrillationThrombusStroke (engine)StenosisThrombosisEmbolism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atrial fibrillation and stroke are common complications of rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS) and require anticoagulation. Current guidelines recommend vitamin K antagonists (VKA) as the preferred choice for stroke prevention and management of intra-cardiac thrombus 1 . Unlike direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), VKA require routine bloodwork for safety and efficacy monitoring. Herein, we describe the case of a migrant seeking refugee status with rheumatic MS, atrial fibrillation and intra-cardiac thrombus who could not receive a VKA, due to socioeconomic barriers. We highlight the echocardiographic thrombus disease course from initial diagnosis, then DOAC failure with thrombus growth, and finally improvement with VKA use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Cardiology→Same topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→