MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416568105 · doi:10.1149/ma2025-0271008mtgabs

Accelerated Cathode Material Discovery Via Laboratory Automation and Machine Learning Tool

2025· article· W4416568105 on OpenAlexaffabout
Derek Li, Farhan Raza, Luis Martin Mejia Mendoza, Yaser Abu‐Lebdeh, Robert W. Black, Zoya Sadighi

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowBattery (electricity)AutomationLaboratory automationCommercializationEnergy storageScale (ratio)Key (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium-ion batteries have revolutionized energy storage across a wide range of applications, from electric vehicles to medical devices and grid energy storage. Since it’s commercialization in 1991, scientific innovations such as nickel-rich cathodes have significantly improved the cost, energy density, and sustainability associated with this technology. However, the development of next-generation lithium-ion batteries via traditional lab scale research methods remains a slow and labor-intensive process, requiring optimization of a wide range of variables such as material concentrations, synthesis parameters, electrolyte choice, and battery architectures. To accelerate the material discovery workflow, the National Research Council (NRC) Canada, has established the Critical Battery Materials Initiative (CBMI), with a key focus on novel battery materials discovery, processing as well as recycling. This is done by integrating lab scale automation and machine learning (ML) into battery research. Currently, we have implemented automated systems for both the synthesis and testing of novel and optimized high-nickel concentration cathode materials, improving experimental throughput, accuracy, and repeatability. As well, ML is being used for predictive discovery and data-driven analysis to learn from previously conducted experiments, optimize key variables, greatly reduce the trial and error related to experimentation, and predict promising materials with a higher degree of efficiency. The most promising materials chemistries from this workflow will be adopted by NRC-Ottawa for refining scale-up processes, which are then subsequently utilized by NRC-Boucherville for device prototyping to offer a complete solution to the electric vehicle’s battery development sectors. 1,2 Our materials discovery workflow starts with an automated high-throughput synthesis platform, capable of producing up to 40 unique advanced cathode materials (doping and reagent) per batch. These synthesized materials are then subject to high-throughput X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) characterizations, with the resulting data analyzed by our ML tools to identify phase compositions and predict novel chemistries with enhanced electrochemical performances using trained large language models (LLM), enabling high-efficiency filtering of promising cathodes. The down-selected materials are then integrated into a combinatorial cell (combi cell), 3 a custom printed circuit board, capable of simultaneously testing up to 64 in-house batteries. These batteries are then subject to electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements, with the collected data analyzed by ML models to predict high-performance cathode chemistries in terms of charge transfer, diffusion properties, and interfacial stability. Through leveraging this highly automated and repeatable workflow, we have significantly accelerated our research cycle and synthesized high-performance cathodes for next-generation lithium-ion batteries. References You Y., Celio H., Li J. Li, Dolocan A., and Manthiram A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 6480 –6485. Duffner F., Kronemeyer N., Tübke J., Leker J., Winter M. and Schmuch R., Nat. Energy, 2021, 6, 123. Potts K. P., Grignon E., and McCalla E., ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 8388−8393. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207