Shelved cages impact affective behavior in Sprague Dawley rats – implications for animal welfare
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laboratory animal welfare has received increasing attention in recent years as housing protocols move toward favoring environments that allow natural behaviors. Within this study, the effects of housing male and female Sprague Dawley rats in standard cages versus taller cages with an upper shelf were investigated. To determine differences in behavior and physiology based upon cage type, home-cage assessment of ultrasonic vocalizations and analysis of fecal corticosterone metabolites, as well as various behavioral tests, were performed. Rats in shelved cages produced significantly less 50 kHz calls, demonstrated better working memory in the spontaneous alternation task and had higher concentrations of fecal corticosterone metabolites. No differences were observed in the open field, elevated plus maze or light-dark box. While no significant treatment differences were found in the ultrasonic vocalization playback paradigm, results confirmed previous evidence of approach behavior upon 50 kHz call playback. The observed differences in behavior and physiology as a consequence of housing conditions inevitably have implications for experimental reproducibility as comparing studies across laboratories may be difficult if different housing parameters are utilized. The results of this study can also be used in guiding future animal welfare protocols given that certain cage modifications such as increased vertical space and/or the presence of a shelf might improve welfare. Investigation of additional parameters and strains of rodents will enhance our understanding of optimal laboratory animal housing conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".