Kim byli zmarli z cmentarza zanikłej wsi Gać? Dane historyczne „kontra” datowanie bezwzględne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cemetery of the abandoned village of Gać, located in Greater Poland, offers new insights into its chronology and function. Excavations conducted since 2017 have uncovered 180 burials, exhibiting stratigraphic complexity and a changing spatial organization. Based on 30 radiocarbon dates, Bayesian chronological modeling revealed that the cemetery was in use from the mid-17th to the end of the 18th century, much later than previously assumed.The results challenge earlier interpretations of the site as a 14th-century parish cemetery. Instead, the cemetery appears to have emerged after the decline of the village parish and may have served specific purposes, such as a cemetery for Protestant communities.By combining radiocarbon dating, stratigraphy, and Bayesian modeling, the study provides a refined chronology and highlights the cemetery’s role during the village’s decline. These findings contribute to understanding post-medieval burial practices and underscore the importance of multi-method approaches in reconstructing complex archaeological sequences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".