MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416588981 · doi:10.1016/j.grets.2025.100316

The role of microbial inoculum in improving composting performance and promoting compost maturation: A review

2025· article· en· W4416588981 on OpenAlexafffund
Hussein G. Salih, Noori M. Cata Saady, Baiyu Zhang, Talib M. Albayati

Bibliographic record

VenueGreen Technologies and Sustainability · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNewfoundland and LabradorDepartment of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesMitacsDepartment of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador
KeywordsCompostMicrobial inoculantOrganic matterMicrobial population biologyBiodegradable wasteMicroplastics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accelerating the composting of organic waste remains a key objective in research and practice. This review aims to critically examine recent advancements in microbial inoculation (MI) strategies and their role in enhancing composting performance and promoting compost maturation. It synthesizes findings on microbial inocula, including single strains and consortia, and their effects on composting phases, microbial succession, and metabolic functions. It discusses the influence of MI on physicochemical parameters, such as moisture content, pH, temperature, and nutrient balance, and the impact on compost stability and humification. It addresses the impact of microplastics on microbial communities in composting, highlighting how microplastics can alter microbial dynamics and affect compost quality. The MI improves the efficiency of organic matter decomposition, shortens the time, enhances pathogen suppression, and produces higher-quality compost. Inoculations encourage enzyme synthesis, accelerate the breakdown of organic matter, elevate temperatures, boost humification, and enhance compost maturity. This review highlights the importance of MI in enhancing organic waste biotransformation, thereby contributing to sustainable waste management and resource recovery. It identifies research gaps and suggests future research directions, including large-scale inoculation trials, economic feasibility assessments, and the development of standardized microbial dosing protocols to support industrial and municipal composting systems. • Inoculants enhance decomposition, pathogen suppression, and compost quality. • Microbial augmentation accelerates degradation, producing stable and mature compost. • Optimizing inoculants and mitigating microplastic effects ensures compost viability. • Effective microbial strain selection and application methods remain underexplored. • Lack of studies on microplastic effects on microbial activity and compost quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreen Technologies and SustainabilitySame topicComposting and Vermicomposting TechniquesFrench-language works237,207