MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416592885 · doi:10.2166/wrd.2025.040

The impact of informal settlement expansion on greywater generation: a potential missed opportunity?

2025· article· en· W4416592885 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wihann van Reenen, Tobias George Barnard

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Reuse · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Reuse
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFaculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg
KeywordsGreywaterInformal settlementsSettlement (finance)ReuseQuarter (Canadian coin)Human settlementPotable waterResource (disambiguation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT South Africa is a semi-arid country with drought on the rise. The government reports that over 3,400 informal settlements exist nationally that both require potable water and generate greywater that could be treated and reused. The current study investigated this using the Zandspruit informal settlement in the Gauteng province of South Africa. Aerial photography graphic information system (GIS) layers of Zandspruit were traced in approximately 3-year intervals between 2000 and 2023, and drone photography was employed in 2022. Using survey data collected within the settlement, in almost a quarter of a century, the usage of potable water and generation of greywater have increased by over 730% to 575 and 400 m3 per day, respectively. More than 62% (248 m3) of greywater was reported as discarded daily outside around dwellings, foregoing any reuse potential. It is important to study how this wasted resource could be purified and reused to contribute to the water needs of the country, and to mitigate health risks and environmental pollution concerns within the community due to greywater exposure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater ReuseSame topicWastewater Treatment and ReuseFrench-language works237,207