MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416594818 · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-25652-2

Labor migration in rural Nepal Arghakhanchi communities: impacts on left-behind caregivers and children

2025· article· en· W4416594818 on OpenAlexaff
Sirjana Adhikari, Mahesh Joshı, Hari Bahadur Rana, Sabrina Cheng, Theresa P. Castillo, Peter Navario, Michelle Boyd, Keng‐Yen Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSociopolitical Dynamics in Nepal
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
FundersUBS Optimus Foundation
KeywordsBiostatisticsPublic healthMental healthRural areaDeveloping countryEpidemiologyService (business)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Children from migrant families with absent parents are more likely to have poorer physical and mental health than children from non-migrant families. The impact of labor migration on left-behind family members in South Asian countries is not well-known. This study aimed to examine the patterns of labor migration and its impact on the health and development of children and their caregivers in rural Nepal. METHODS: Baseline family data collected from a school-based violence prevention program were utilized. Parents/caregivers (N = 346) with school-aged children (aged 3 to 15 years attending nursery to primary grades) from the rural Arghakhanchi district of Nepal were included in the study. A series of descriptive and chi-square analyses were carried out to explore the pattern of labor migration and differences between labor-migrant and non-labor-migrant families. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were applied to explore the correlates and moderators involved. RESULTS: Labor migration has been a common practice in rural Nepal, with an estimated 49% of families having parents working overseas, mostly in India (57%) and Gulf countries (39%) on low-skill labor jobs. Labor migration was significantly associated with left-behind caregivers' and children's mental health. Left-behind caregivers in father-only labor-migrant families reported higher levels of depression than did parents in non-labor migrant families and left-behind children from labor-migrant families reported greater anger than did children from non-labor migrant families. The impact of labor migration on families was moderated by social class. For low social-class father migrant families, left-behind children were at greater risk for developmental delay and behavioral problems, but there seems to be a protective effect for high social-class father migrant families (with lower risk of developmental delay and problem behaviors compared to all other groups). CONCLUSIONS: Labor migration has a substantial impact on the mental health of left-behind families and children. The impact of labor migration may vary by living social-cultural context. Understanding the complex dynamics of labor migration has important implications for local and global migration-related health service planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public Health→Same topicSociopolitical Dynamics in Nepal→French-language works237,207→