MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

All raw demographic and experimental data from the present study.

2018· dataset· en· W4416597494 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Austin, Karen Wills, D Kilpatrick, E. Haydn Walters

Bibliographic record

VenueFaculty of 1000 Research Ltd · 2018
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExperimental dataRaw dataPopulationExperimental researchData collection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema (ACPE) is characterized by acute breathlessness and hypoxia and is associated with poor prognosis. Standard pre-hospital management of ACPE includes high-flow oxygen, nitroglycerin and, in severe cases, assisted ventilation. Patients with ACPE can be supported with newer modalities of non-invasive ventilation, specifically continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with ACPE treated with CPAP plus low-flow oxygen pre-hospitally have a lower mortality rate than those treated conventionally. Methods: This study was a pre-hospital randomised, non-blinded controlled trial conducted July 2009–July 2010. Included were all participants transported by ambulance and admitted to the Royal Hobart Hospital, Tasmania, Australia. The study population was consecutive persons ≥18 years of age with sudden onset of severe respiratory distress, diagnosed as ACPE. Patients were included if they required ventilatory assistance. Patients required a GCS >12 and blood pressure >90 mmHg systolic to safely receive CPAP. The primary outcome was pre- or in-hospital mortality. Results: In total, 50 patients were enrolled with mean age of 79.8 (±11.9) years. There were two deaths (8.3%) in the CPAP arm and nine (34.6%) in the control arm (RR, −0.24; 95% CI, 0.06–1.00; p=0.051) with a number needed to treat of 4. CPAP plus low-flow oxygen was significantly less likely to result in respiratory acidosis (mean difference in pH, −0.11; 95% CI, −0.04–−0.17; p=0.002), with elevated pCO 2 (mean difference, −10.0 mmHg; 95% CI, −19.2–−0.78; p=0.026). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the surviving patients who received CPAP (ratio of means, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.29–0.70; p≤0.001). Discussion: This study, which provides interim results due to early termination of the trial, shows CPAP in the pre-hospital setting for ACPE is practicable and is associated with improved patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0830.113

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.173
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueFaculty of 1000 Research LtdFrench-language works237,207