MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416600673 · doi:10.1149/ma2025-02582744mtgabs

Customizable Porous Electrodes for Redox Flow Batteries via Additive Manufacturing

2025· article· en· W4416600673 on OpenAlexaff
Maxime van der Heijden, Mojtaba Barzegari, Antoni Forner‐Cuenca

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrodePorosityElectrolyteBattery (electricity)FabricationMicrostructureFlexibility (engineering)Electrochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Porous electrodes play a crucial role in the performance and cost-effectiveness of redox flow batteries (RFBs) by providing the necessary surface area for the electrochemical reactions, facilitating electrolyte transport, and contributing to mass, charge, and heat transfer. Enhancing the electrode performance can increase the power density and reduce the battery costs. However, traditional carbon-fiber porous electrodes, adapted from fuel cell gas diffusion layers, are not optimized for liquid-phase electrochemistry. Therefore, new manufacturing techniques that allow for precise control of the electrode microstructure and properties are required. Additive manufacturing is particularly interesting for obtaining controlled architectures, which enables the study of geometry-performance relationships and the production of high-performance electrodes with improved electrochemical performance and lower hydraulic resistance. In my presentation, I will discuss our recent advancements in the additive manufacturing of porous electrodes for RFBs, where we demonstrate the flexibility of this approach for the fabrication of electrode microstructures for electrochemical applications. I will specifically focus on our work on triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structures as RFB electrodes. TPMS structures, naturally occurring in butterfly wings, leaves, and sea urchin skeletons, feature periodic surfaces with large surface areas that are advantageous for RFB electrodes. In our previous research, we demonstrated that the electrode pillar shape influences mass transfer rates, leading us to explore various TPMS designs, including gyroid, diamond, and IWP. We fabricated TPMS electrodes using a commercial desktop digital light processing printer followed by carbonization. In organic redox flow cells, TPMS electrodes demonstrated higher internal surface area and improved mass transport compared to cubic periodic structures, improving the reactor performance. The diamond TPMS, in particular, outperformed regular cubic structures, showing the lowest overpotential and highest current density and mass transfer coefficient. Our research emphasizes the potential of additive manufacturing to develop customized porous electrodes with multiscale structures that offer superior electrochemical performance and low hydraulic resistance. Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge funding by the European Union (ERC, FAIR-RFB, ERC-2021-STG 101042844). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207