MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ADGRG1/GPR56 in cartilage bioengineering: A potential marker for superior chondrogenesis

2025· article· en· W4416608100 on OpenAlexaff
Liam McEachern, Zhiyao Ma, Adetola B. Adesida

Bibliographic record

VenueRegenerative medicine reports . · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCartilageChondrogenesisReceptorNasal cartilagesChondrocyteSignal transductionGene expressionReceptor expressionGlycosaminoglycan

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To repair excised portions of the nose in non-melanoma skin cancer, surgeons have begun to use tissue-engineered nasal cartilage autografts. While promising, this approach has been hindered by significant inter-donor variability of cartilage quality within the autografts. For this approach to become clinically viable, there is a need to pre-select nasal chondrocytes with the capacity to create high-quality cartilage for autograft engineering. Recently, using RNA sequencing of clonal nasal chondrocyte populations, we have discovered G protein-coupled receptor 56 (aka ADGRG1 ) expression to be positively correlated with glycosaminoglycan per DNA (cellular content) and SOX9 expression, both are metrics of chondrogenic capacity. This correlation suggests G protein-coupled receptor 56 holds promise to be a marker of nasal chondrocytes with the capacity to produce high quality cartilage. G protein-coupled receptor 56 has been extensively studied in fields such as neural development, hematopoiesis, and cancer but is unreported within the cartilage biology field. This narrative review examines the molecular, cellular and physiological literature of G protein-coupled receptor 56, including some of its known ligands: collagen III, transglutaminase 2, testosterone, and signaling pathways: Ras homolog gene family, member A/Rho-associated protein kinase, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT/mechanistic target of rapamycin, Nuclear Factor of Activated T-cells, cyclic adenosine monophosphate/protein kinase A. We then integrate the literature of these ligands and signaling pathways from the cartilage biology field to hypothesize the specific cellular and physiological role of G protein-coupled receptor 56 within cartilage. Ultimately, this review highlights the promise of G protein-coupled receptor 56 as a cell marker for high-quality cartilage production, we emphasize the need for further empirical investigation of G protein-coupled receptor 56 in the cartilage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegenerative medicine reports .Same topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207