Development of Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells for CO <sub>2</sub> Utilization at Canadian Nuclear Laboratories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High temperature electrolysis has been studied to co-electrolyse steam and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) to produce syngas (mixture of carbon monoxide - CO - and hydrogen - H 2 ). Due to the low temperature operating range (400°C - 700°C) and easier gas separation, proton conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells (H-SOECs) have attracted significant interest in recent years since more conventional and less expensive materials of the manufacturing of the electrolyser and for the construction of plant equipment (e.g., heat exchangers, piping, heaters, etc.) can be used. Oxygen-conducting solid oxide electrolysis cells (O-SOEC), although more mature and developed, required higher temperatures to operate [1]. For the H-SOEC, doped BaZrO 3 -BaCeO 3 mixtures have been reported for round button H-SOECs with small diameters [2]; however, flat planar-type H-SOECs with larger dimensions are neither frequently reported in the literature nor commercially available due to material-related issues such as poor sinter-ability, warping during sintering and insufficient chemical stability during operation. On the other hand, the performance of commercially available O-SOECs have significantly improved over the years; however, there is still a need to further develop materials, and combination of materials, for O-SOECs to operate under electrolysis/co-electrolysis process at an intermediate temperature range with better long-term performance ( i.e ., voltage degradation rate lower than 2.3 %-V/1000 h). Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) has extended its hydrogen production program to the production of syngas by utilizing CO 2 from hard-to-abate industries. Currently, CNL is focused on improving the cell performance during steam electrolysis and steam/CO 2 co-electrolysis for both H-SOEC and O-SOEC. A central aspect of this work is to develop durable and scalable electrolyser components (electrodes and electrolytes) by optimizing fabrication parameters such as the formulations of support slurries (either electrolyte or cathode) for tape-casting with suitable sintering aids. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) are used to characterize the prepared materials. Some single cell test results will also be presented under the selected steam/CO 2 co-electrolysis conditions. References Zheng, J. Wang, B. Yu, W. Zhang, J. Chen, J. Qiao and J. Zhang, “A review of high temperature co-electrolysis of H 2 O and CO 2 to produce sustainable fuels using solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs): advanced materials and technology”, Chemical Society Reviews 46 (2017) 1427-1463. D. Medvedev, “Trends in research and development of protonic ceramic electrolysis cells”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44 (2019) 26711-26740.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".