MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416613176 · doi:10.1149/ma2025-022211mtgabs

Optimizing the Stability and Longevity of High-Nickel Cathode Materials for Next-Generation Li-Ion Batteries

2025· article· W4416613176 on OpenAlexaff
R. Y. Chen, Vahid Moradi, Lida Hadidi, Byron D. Gates

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyScanning electron microscopeScanning transmission electron microscopyCathodeTransmission electron microscopyEnergy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopyCoatingElectron energy loss spectroscopyElectrochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium-ion batteries play a pivotal role in modern energy storage, powering devices ranging from portable electronics to electric vehicles and renewable energy systems. NMC 811 (Li 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 ) is a promising cathode material known for its high energy density. However, its performance is compromised by challenges such as cation mixing – specifically, the exchange of nickel and lithium ions within the crystal lattice – and surface degradation, which collectively lead to reduced cycle life and capacity fading. This research investigates multi-element coating and doping strategies aimed at enhancing the stability and longevity of NMC 811 cathodes. These multi-element approaches involve simultaneous doping and coating with multiple species to synergistically enhance material performance. Specifically, we focus on co-doping and co-coating NMC 811 with boron, aluminum, and niobium species synthesized using our collaborator’s one-pot process to mitigate degradation mechanisms. These approaches aim to stabilize the crystal structure, minimize detrimental phase transformations, and enhance interfacial stability during cycling. The materials were rigorously characterized to provide comprehensive insights into their structural, morphological, chemical, and electrochemical properties. Characterization techniques employed include X-ray Diffraction (XRD) for phase identification and crystallographic analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for detailed morphological and microstructural investigations, scanning transmission electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (STEM-EDS) for elemental distribution analyses, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) for surface chemistry characterization. Furthermore, electrochemical performance was evaluated through extensive galvanostatic cycling and rate capability tests to systematically assess capacity retention, cycling stability, and performance at various charge/discharge rates. By addressing the underlying issues affecting NMC 811 cathode performance through these advanced multi-elemental doping and coating techniques, this study contributes substantially to the development of safer, more durable, and highly efficient lithium-ion batteries. The resulting improvements in battery durability, capacity retention, and overall performance are critical for meeting the demanding requirements of next-generation energy storage applications, particularly in electric vehicles and grid-scale energy storage solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207