Empathy among management students : An assessment scale-based study of university students in Gujarat
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Empathy refers to perceiving the emotional state of others, an essential soft skill yet missing among today’s generation. The present study investigates the significance of empathy among management students by evaluating the variables affecting empathy levels, exploring the factors influencing empathy scores and using the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) for selected universities in Gujarat. A structured questionnaire was administered to 482 university students between November 2024 and January 2025, collecting primary data. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were applied to assess construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability using the AMOS tool to ensure the robustness of the TEQ. The findings indicate that Leader Emotional Engagement (LEE) has a strong positive impact on Employee Dedication (ED). Emotional Awareness (EA) shows a moderate influence on Emotional Resilience (ER), while Employee Dedication (ED) exhibits a moderate-to-strong effect on ER. These results highlight the interconnected roles of leadership, emotional awareness and dedication in shaping workplace emotional resilience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it