MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416623067 · doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2025.103503

Striatin-3 is a human autoantigen but it is not associated with the S-phase G2 nuclear antigen (SG2NA) staining pattern

2025· article· en· W4416623067 on OpenAlexaff
Marvin J. Fritzler, Yoshinao Muro, Werner Klotz, Manfred Herold, Luís Eduardo Coelho Andrade, Marcelle Grecco, Minoru Satoh, May Y. Choi, María Infantino, Edward K. L. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Autoimmunity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoantibodyImmunofluorescenceAntibodyStainingAntigenNuclear protein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human autoantibodies have a long history of being valuable reagents to identify and characterize unique subcellular compartments, macromolecular complexes, and their individual components. One such discovery started as a unique cell-cycle related immunofluorescence pattern characterized as autoantibody targets localized in S and G2 phase nuclei of tissue culture cells, which became known as the "SG2NA" (SG2 nuclear antigen). These descriptions were followed by the identification of a calmodulin-binding protein family named 'striatin' that was later identified as three paralogs: Striatin/STRN1, Striatin-3/STRN3/SG2NA, and Striatin-4/STRN4/Zinedin. Many subsequent reports have used the designations SG2NA and striatin interchangeably. This report reviews the history of SG2NA and clarifies that striatin-3 is indeed a target autoantigen of some autoimmune sera, but commercially available striatin-3 antibodies or human sera that react with striatin-3 do not produce a SG2 phase nuclear staining pattern on HEp-2 cells. Hence, future reports should not use anti-SG2NA and anti-striatin interchangeably.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of AutoimmunitySame topicAutoimmune Bullous Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207