MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416630733 · doi:10.1016/j.jlb.2025.100373

Liquid Biopsies of Lung Cancer and Next Generation Sequencing at Sub-Saharan Africa Sites (LUNGS@AFRICA)

2025· article· en· W4416630733 on OpenAlexaff
Nadia Ghazali, Catherine Brown, Trevor J. Pugh, Kelechi E. Okonta, Mansoor N. Saleh, Shahin Sayed, Richard Khanyile, Zodwa Dlamini

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Liquid Biopsy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchSinai Health SystemPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLung cancerLiquid biopsyBiopsyCancerCohortLung biopsyLungDNA sequencing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: There is a lack of genomic and epidemiologic data regarding lung cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa. Liquid biopsy is a non-invasive and scalable approach for molecular profiling. This pilot study aims to determine the prevalence of actionable genetic alterations (AGAs) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using liquid biopsy while establishing a liquid biopsy testing pipeline in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Liquid BiopsySame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207