Fully automatic quantification of pulmonary fat attenuation volume by CT: an exploratory pilot study in non-malignant chronic lung diseases.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Lipid metabolism and deposition is altered in the lung of patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (fILD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study was aimed at detecting lipids alterations by using computed tomography (CT)-based analysis of pulmonary fat attenuation volume (CTpfav) in patients with non-malignant chronic lung diseases. Methods: This observational retrospective single-center study included 716 chest CT scans from three subcohorts: fILD (n = 154), COPD (n = 283) and controls (n = 279). Fully automated quantification of CTpfav was based on lung segmentation and HU-thresholding. The pulmonary fat index (PFI) was derived by normalizing CTpfav to the CT lung volume. Results: Patients with fILDs demonstrated a significant increase in CTpfav (median 71.0 mL, interquartile range [IQR] 59.7 mL, p < 0.001) and PFI (median 1.9%, IQR 2.4%, p < 0.001) when compared to the control group (CTpfav median 43.6 mL, IQR 16.94 mL; PFI median 0.9%, IQR 0.5%). In contrast, individuals with COPD exhibited significantly reduced CTpfav (median 36.2 mL, IQR 11.4 mL, p < 0.001) and PFI (median 0.5%, IQR 0.2%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The fully automated method for quantifying CTpfav might provide a new imaging marker for assessing chronic lung diseases like ILD and COPD in the clinical routine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".