MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416642004 · doi:10.1103/cy84-v69x

Cavity-Enhanced Doppler-Broadening Thermometry via All-Frequency Metrology

2025· article· en· W4416642004 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Qi Huang, Jin Wang, Rui-Heng Yin, Yan Tan, Cunfeng Cheng, Yu Sun, A.-W. Liu, Shui-Ming Hu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaHeritage Foundation of Newfoundland and Labrador
KeywordsMetrologyDoppler effectDoppler broadeningTemperature measurementCalibrationMeasurement uncertainty

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate Doppler broadening thermometry (DBT) with all-frequency-domain measurements. Using the R(10) transition of CO at 1567 nm in a high-finesse optical cavity (mode width 0.6 kHz), we resolve Doppler profiles with high signal-to-noise ratios across 2-17 Pa pressures. A global Voigt-profile analysis yields temperatures deviating by only -2.0±3.6 mK from calibrated thermometers, with systematic errors suppressed below 9 ppm. The results show negligible dependence on line-shape models when accounting for pressure effects, resolving a long-standing challenge in DBT. This approach establishes a new paradigm for quantum-based thermometry and provides a precision platform for testing molecular collision physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207