MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416642087 · doi:10.1021/acscatal.5c05030

Structural Dynamics and Energy Landscape of the Forward and Reverse Water–Gas Shift Catalytic Cycle on Ceria

2025· article· en· W4416642087 on OpenAlexafffund
Guangming Cai, Ya-Huei Chin

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Catalysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of TorontoSuncor Energy Incorporated
KeywordsKinetic energyCatalysisActivation energyEnergy landscapeOxygenDiffusionCatalytic cycleHeterogeneous catalysisActivation barrier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The water–gas shift catalytic cycle (CO + H2O ⇄ CO2 + H2), in both the forward (WGS) and reverse (RWGS) directions, is a classical reaction central to fuel and chemical synthesis that interconverts reductant-and-oxidant pairs (red + ox → ox′ + red′), i.e., in WGS, CO (red) to CO2 (ox′) and H2O (ox) to H2 (red′), and in RWGS, H2 (red) to H2O (ox′) and CO2 (ox) to CO (red′). Within this cycle, the energy landscape and kinetic relevance of the steps have not yet been fully established and reconciled, especially on oxide surfaces, simply due to their structural complexities and changing oxygen contents. Here, we establish the mechanistic framework and associated barriers for each step of the cycle, in both directions, on modeled ceria (CeO2) through kinetic interrogations under induction, steady-state, and transient regimes, each providing distinct thermodynamic and kinetic insights into the barriers of individual steps and intraparticle O-atom diffusion between surface and bulk, as the oxygen content in CeO2–x varies (x = 0–0.2) and redistributes. In RWGS, surface O atom abstraction by H2 is the sole kinetically relevant step on partially reduced CeO2–x oxides (x = 0.024–0.038) with a barrier of 180 ± 3 kJ mol–1, determined from steady-state kinetics, whereas surface reoxidation by CO2 at O-vacancies is rapid with an apparent activation energy of 51 ± 1 kJ mol–1 that decreases with increasing O-vacancy formation energy, revealed by transient kinetic studies that decouple this step from the preceding kinetic bottleneck. In WGS, the reverse reaction, both surface O atom abstraction by CO (92 ± 21 kJ mol–1) and surface reoxidation by H2O (89 ± 6 kJ mol–1) are kinetically relevant, derived from steady-state rate measurements. Integrating findings from both reactions, we delineate a unified mechanistic paradigm underpinned by an experimentally determined, thermodynamically consistent energy landscape wherein the observed kinetic constraints for RWGS and WGS depend solely on the direction through which this landscape is traversed. These insights elucidate surface reactions, structural dynamics, and O atom transport underlying water–gas shift reactions on ceria under working conditions, providing a robust foundation for understanding how variations in chemical potential drive changes in oxygen content to enable efficient CO and CO2 conversions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS CatalysisSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207