MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416649853 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3636738

Optimized UAV Deployment and Blockchain-Based Caching: A Reinforcement Learning Framework

2025· article· W4416649853 on OpenAlexaff
Sahand Khodaparas, Abderrahim Benslimane, Saleh Yousefi, Chadi Assi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningSoftware deploymentScalabilityPopularityCacheScheme (mathematics)Latency (audio)The Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within the rapidly expanding Internet of Vehicles (IoV) landscape, the demand for network services to accommodate data-intensive applications has become increasingly paramount. However, IoV faces significant challenges, including high latency, limited coverage in remote areas, network congestion, and privacy concerns in content popularity prediction. To address these challenges, we introduce the Scalable Optimisation for Networked Aerial-vehicles (SONA) scheme, which reduces latency through advanced caching techniques while enhancing coverage and ensuring required data rates using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). UAVs are deployed to augment coverage in areas lacking RoadSide Unit (RSU) support and to assist in scenarios where RSUs are overwhelmed, ensuring continuous data rate provision. Our scheme introduces a novel mathematical optimisation model and machine learning algorithms: Federated Learning (FL) to collaboratively predict content popularity without exposing user data, Reinforcement Learning (RL) to dynamically optimise UAV placement and energy-efficient deployment, and blockchain to enable secure, decentralized coordination between RSUs and UAVs for real-time decision-making. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, achieving an average delay of 8 ms, an average cache hit rate of 88.43%, and satisfying desired data rate requirements in 84.85% of scenarios, significantly improving IoV performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207