MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416650129 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3636810

Performance Insights Into Neural Estimation in mm-Wave Systems

2025· article· W4416650129 on OpenAlexaff
Islam AbuMahady, Deeb Assad Tubail, Mohammed Zourob, Salama Ikki

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and ELM
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkFocus (optics)Mean squared errorWork (physics)EstimationRange (aeronautics)Extreme learning machineWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work seeks to uncover the black-box nature of the Neural Networks (NNs) solutions in wireless systems. Specifically, this work examines direction and range estimation in millimetre-wave ($mm$-wave) systems, particularly under real-world conditions influenced by the transceivers' hardware impairments (HWIs). As a case study, we focus on the Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) algorithm, widely used in the literature as a low-complexity and efficient NN-based solution for mitigating HWIs effects. To address the challenges associated with the hidden nature of NNs, the well-known metric, Mean Squared Error (MSE), of the ELM solution is derived and studied analytically. Simulation results validate the accuracy of the derived MSE expression, demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicMachine Learning and ELMFrench-language works237,207