MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416651855 · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf755

Normal echocardiographic and electrocardiographic indices in young female athletes: a meta-analysis across sex, types of sports, races, and ethnicities

2025· article· en· W4416651855 on OpenAlexaffabout
Noémie Laurier, Zoé Salvini, Leena Syed, Amir Hodžić, Jiayi Ni, Paul Poirier, Marc-André d’Entremont, Sanjit S. Jolly, Kim A. Connelly, François Tournoux, Thao Huynh

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of TorontoHamilton Health SciencesUniversité de MontréalPopulation Health Research InstituteUniversité LavalMcGill University Health CentreCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeMcMaster UniversityUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAthletesEthnic groupNormativeElectrocardiographyYoung adultBody mass indexEpidemiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: High-intensity physical training induces cardiac remodelling, but data on the female athlete's heart are limited. We aimed to determine the normal echocardiographic (ECHO) and electrocardiographic (ECG) indices in young female athletes, compare them with female non-athletes and male athletes, and evaluate differences between female athletes of different races/ethnicities and types of sports. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched four databases for studies including female athletes aged 18-35. A meta-analysis compared cardiovascular indices between female athletes and the groups above. We included 41 quantitative studies enrolling 11 956 female athletes, 14 014 male athletes, and 549 female non-athletes. Mean age (95% confidence intervals) in years was 22.4 (21.5-23.3) for female athletes, 23.7 (22.3-25.0) for female non-athletes, and 22.3 (21.3-23.3) for male athletes. Female athletes had higher left ventricular end-diastolic volume index [72.5 (66.3-78.8) vs. 55.4 (46.4-64.7) mL/m², P = 0.001], left ventricular mass index (LVMi) [80.8 (75.9-85.7) vs. 62.1(56.6-67.6) g/m², P < 0.0001], and left atrial volume index [29.2 (25.4-32.9) vs. 22.4 (18.7-26.1) mL/m², P = 0.01] than female non-athletes. The LVMi was 21% higher in male athletes than female athletes [98.3 (89.7-106.9) vs. 81.4 (76.6-86.2) g/m2, P < 0.0001]. Black female athletes had more frequent T-wave inversions on ECG than other races/ethnicities [15.2 (7.3-28.8) % of Black vs. 5.4 (2.9-9.9) % of White vs. 2.6 (0.7-9.9) % of Pacific Islanders vs. 0.7 (0.04-9.7) % of Metis, P = 0.04]. CONCLUSION: We confirmed sex-specific left ventricular remodelling, with more eccentric remodelling in female athletes. Black female athletes showed more T-wave inversions than female athletes of other races/ethnicities. Our aggregate means of ECHO and ECG indices may serve as normative values for young female athletes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.020
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Preventive CardiologySame topicCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseFrench-language works237,207