MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416659725 · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ae2411

On black holes in new general relativity

2025· article· en· W4416659725 on OpenAlexafffund
Diego F. López, A. A. Coley, R. J. van den Hoogen

Bibliographic record

VenueClassical and Quantum Gravity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier UniversityDalhousie University
FundersFaculty of Graduate Studies, Dalhousie UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalhousie University
KeywordsGeneral relativityGeodesics in general relativityGeodesicTheory of relativityBlack hole (networking)Torsion (gastropod)Congruence (geometry)Interpretation (philosophy)Four-force

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract New general relativity (NGR) is a class of teleparallel theories defined by three free parameters, effectively reduced to two after appropriate normalization, which are subject to experimental constraints. In this framework, matter couples minimally to the metric, ensuring that test particles follow geodesics and that null congruence expansions can be employed to detect local horizons. Assuming such horizons exist, we demonstrate that all physically viable NGR models, including the teleparallel equivalent of general Relativity and the one-parameter Hayashi and Shirafuji model, inevitably exhibit divergences in torsion scalars at the local horizon. This singular behavior obstructs the interpretation of these models and their associated teleparallel geometries as black hole configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClassical and Quantum GravitySame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207