Distinct Roles of Positive and Negative Maternal Mental Health in Parenting Styles and Child Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Maternal mental health significantly impacts child development, yet the role of positive maternal mental health in shaping parenting and child outcomes remains unclear. This study examined how parenting styles mediate the relation between maternal mental health and developmental outcomes in 4- to 4.5-year-old children. Method: This study used data from the multiethnic Growing Up in Singapore Towards healthy Outcomes (GUSTO) cohort. A total of 328 mothers, who were recruited from Singapore hospital maternity units between 2009 and 2010, had completed longitudinal postnatal assessments of their mental health and parenting and child measures in English. Maternal mental health and parenting styles were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory-II, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire. Behavioral problems, school readiness, executive function, and IQ were assessed in children at 4 to 4.5 years old using validated behavioral and cognitive assessments. Results: < .001), which mediated improvements in child executive function, verbal and numeracy abilities, and IQ. Conclusion: These findings highlight the distinct role of positive maternal mental health in fostering authoritative parenting, which in turn supports child cognitive development. Public health initiatives should prioritize promoting positive maternal mental health to enhance effective parenting and optimize child cognitive outcomes. Future research should consider paternal influences. Diversity & Inclusion Statement: We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. Diverse cell lines and/or genomic datasets were not available. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".