MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416664584 · doi:10.1364/ol.579361

Numerical super-oscillatory filtering for sub-diffraction optical imaging

2025· article· en· W4416664584 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDigital Holography and Microscopy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInterferometryFourier transformImage processingPoint spread functionOptical imagingWavelengthResolution (logic)Image qualityFourier opticsImage resolutionSpectral imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Super-oscillatory (SO) imaging is a far-field imaging technique to super-resolve unlabeled objects. Previous theoretical and simulation-based studies have shown attractive possibilities to simplify the SO imaging configuration by implementing SO imaging numerically. However, numerical SO imaging has not yet been experimentally demonstrated in real optical systems. In this work, we reconstruct the complex field of a diffraction-limited (DL) image with the phase-shifting interferometry (PSI) technique, enabling the application of numerically designed SO filters in the Fourier domain. Experimental results at a wavelength of 632.8 nm validate the proposed method, showing improved resolution and image fidelity. Quantitatively, the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) is reduced by 42% and the structural similarity index (SSIM) is enhanced from 0.19 to 0.29.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it