MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416664673 · doi:10.33823/jfs.2025.7.1.293

The Death of Andean Devils, the Life of Counter-Reformation Saints

2025· article· en· W4416664673 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eduardo Ángel Cruz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Festive Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLatin American history and culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismCultHonorIndigenousScrutiny

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the diabladas, or “dances of devils,” performed in honor of Catholic saints in northern Peru, with a specific focus on the cult of Isidro Labrador. Moving beyond the traditional anthropological emphasis on pre-Columbian elements and the historical analysis of “demonization” of Native beliefs during the colonial period, this study argues that diabladas served as a bridge between the preservation of Native religious identities and the various colonial acculturation campaigns of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. By investigating the Indigenous adaptation of a cult closely associated with Spanish colonialism, the article demonstrates that Native resistance was not limited to overt acts of defiance but was also expressed through subtle and sophisticated strategies of intermediation. It highlights how, by joyfully adopting the cults of newly canonized saints, Andean and coastal communities were able to maintain their ritual traditions—particularly the dances connected to agricultural life, which were subjected to intense scrutiny during the “Extirpation of Idolatries” campaigns in seventeenth-century Peru.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0100.012
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Festive StudiesSame topicLatin American history and cultureFrench-language works237,207