MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416666144 · doi:10.3390/d17120808

Influence of Arctic Conditions on the Diatom Diversity of Islands Within the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna Region

2025· article· en· W4416666144 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sophia Barınova, В. А. Габышев, B. Z. Borisov, Sviatoslav Rybnikov

Bibliographic record

VenueDiversity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
KeywordsBioindicatorSpecies richnessDiatomArcticBenthic zoneFaunaBiodiversityEutrophicationArctic ecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The distribution of algal biodiversity is important for better understanding the factors controlling ecosystem functioning in harsh Arctic and sub-Arctic habitats. In this region, diatoms are the most representative and best indicators of environmental parameters. Here, we analyzed the distribution of 1268 diatom species across 18 islands within the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) region based on our own and published data. To assess the representativeness of these floras, we examine genus–species associations, a method applicable to future algal flora studies. Diatom diversity is sufficiently high across the islands, with species richness decreasing toward higher latitudes. Species–area relationship models indicate that latitude—and even more so factors describing climatic extremes, like BIO19 (19 standard bioclimatic variables)—affects species richness stronger than islands area, and combined environmental and geographic predictors explain up to 81% of the observed variation. Bioindicator analysis reveals an increase in water pH, content in organic matter, and the number of eutrophic and mixotrophic species southward, which correlates with rising temperatures, as shown by the BIO19 and DHI (Dynamic Habitat Index) environmental indices. The latitudinal distribution of bioindicators demonstrates the ecological response of diatom communities to climatic factors and allows the identification of key indicator groups experiencing optimal conditions. So, island diatom species prefer benthic and planktonic–benthic habitats, well-oxygenated waters with low salinity, and moderate temperatures, which prevail on all islands except Vancouver Island, located outside the CAFF (Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna) region. A comparative analysis of bioindicators as a response to Arctic conditions of island diatoms revealed circumpolar similarities, connections with the corresponding parts of the Eurasian and North American continents, as well as similarities in the conditions of the islands closest to the pole. Almost a third of the island diatom list (324 species) was assigned IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) vulnerability categories, 112 of which were in the three most threatened categories (Ex, Cr, and En) with their number increasing southwards, but 944 species have not been evaluated yet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiversitySame topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207