An Integrated Kinetic Modeling Framework for Copyrolysis of Biomass and Plastic Waste
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Developing robust kinetic models for pyrolytic processes is challenging due to the complex properties of solid feedstock materials and their intricate reaction pathways. This study introduced a three-module modeling framework designed to provide a systematic approach for addressing these challenges. A kinetic model was developed to simulate the copyrolysis of red oak wood and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) at a 1:1 mass mixing ratio. In the first module, a parallel reaction mechanism was developed, and the corresponding kinetic parameters were initially estimated using the Friedman method with thermogravimetric (TGA) data and subsequently refined through a least-squares optimization method. A kinetic model using the parallel reaction mechanism was used to predict the conversion of the solid mixture. Due to the limitations of TGA data, the kinetic model was incapable of predicting the product yields from copyrolysis. In the second module, the kinetic model was retrained with experimental data of copyrolysis in a vertical-tube reactor, and the parallel reaction mechanism was also updated with the mass distribution coefficients of bioproducts calculated using the SLSQP (Sequential Least Squares Programming) method. However, this model exhibited inaccuracies at a higher temperature, 700 °C, indicating the absence of crucial secondary reactions. To address this issue, the kinetic model was restructured by combining tar decomposition reactions with the parallel-reaction mechanism. The kinetic parameters of tar decomposition reactions were calculated using the PSO (Particle Swarm Optimization) method. Finally, the kinetic model using the combined reaction mechanism successfully simulated copyrolysis and was validated with experimental data at 500, 600, and 700 °C, providing accurate predictions for both solid conversion and product generation. The findings of this work demonstrate that the methodology for identifying reaction mechanisms and determining kinetic parameters can also be valuable to the modeling of other complex pyrolytic processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".