Initial Outcomes from a Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery—Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (MICS-OPCAB) Programme: A Case Series of the First 50 Patients Single-Centre Experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS-OPCAB) offers potential advantages over conventional sternotomy, including reduced trauma and faster recovery. This study evaluates the safety and feasibility of MICS-OPCAB at our centre. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 50 consecutive MICS-OPCAB procedures performed via left anterior thoracotomy at our institution between January 2023 and June 2025. Data collected included patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes. Endpoints were 30-day mortality, conversion to sternotomy, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: . Comorbidities included diabetes mellitus in 26%, COPD in 12%, and chronic kidney disease in 8%. Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina classes III-IV were present in 46%. The majority of patients (64%) had single-vessel CAD while 34% had two-vessel and 2% had three-vessel involvement. The mean Logistic EuroSCORE I was 2.19 ± 1.53. Left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafting was performed in 96% of cases. Additional conduits included left radial artery in 32% and saphenous vein in 8%, with T-grafts in 26% and sequential grafting in 4%. The average number of grafts per patient was 1.35 ± 0.53 (range 1-3). The procedure was performed off-pump in 96% of cases, with two patients (4%) requiring CPB support during conversion from mini-thoracotomy. The overall conversion rate to sternotomy was 16% (eight patients), predominantly due to difficult or injurious IMA harvest or anatomical limitations. The mean operative time was 197.8 ± 76.8 min and decreased significantly after the first 25 cases (220 min vs. 175 min). Atrial fibrillation occurred in 18%, pleural effusion in 28% (10% requiring drainage), and chest infection in 8%. Wound complications arose in 4%. There was no 30-day mortality. ICU stay averaged 2 ± 2.2 days (range 1-14), and total hospital stay was 5.7 ± 2.7 days where institutional coronary bypass stay is normally 7.9 +/- 7.0 days. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that MICS-OPCAB is a safe and feasible approach for selected patients requiring multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting. There are some technical challenges during the learning curve for which conversion to open surgery can confer good outcomes. Traversing the early learning curve can confer additional benefits to later patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".