MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416676987 · doi:10.3389/fnetp.2025.1701758

Towards standardizing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with deep-learning algorithm: a comprehensive multi-model strategy

2025· article· en· W4416676987 on OpenAlex
Silvia Paola Corona, Théo Godefroy, Olivier Tastet, Denis Corbin, Thomas Modine, Stephan von Bardeleben, Frédéric Lesage, Walid Ben Ali

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Network Physiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowQuality (philosophy)Mitral valveDecision support systemWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Severe mitral valve regurgitation requires comprehensive evaluation for optimal treatment. Initial screening uses transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), followed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to determine eligibility for adequate intervention. Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (M-TEER) indications are based on detailed and quality valve and sub-valvular apparatus assessment, including anatomy and regurgitation pathophysiology. Aim: To develop AI algorithms for standardizing M-TEER eligibility assessment using TTE and TEE echocardiograms, supporting all stages of mitral valve regurgitation evaluation to assist non-expert centers throughout the entire process, from severe mitral valve regurgitation diagnostic to M-TEER procedure. Methods: Three deep learning algorithms were developed using echocardiographic data from M-TEER patients performed at Montreal Heart Institute (2018-2025). 1. ECHO-PREP was trained to identify key diagnostic views in TTE (n = 530) and diagnostic and procedural views in TEE (n = 2,222) examinations to determine the level of quality images needed to do a M-TEER. 2. 4D TEE segmentation with automated mitral valve area (MVA) quantification (n = 221), and 3. 2D TEE scallop-level segmentation of leaflets and sub-valvular structures (n = 992). Results: Preliminary results on test sets showed 95.7% accuracy in TTE view classification and 91% accuracy for TEE view classification. The 4D segmentation module demonstrated excellent agreement with manual MVA measurements (R = 0.84, p < 0.001), successfully discriminating patients undergoing M-TEER from those referred for surgical replacement (p = 0.046 for AI predictions). The 2D scallop-level analysis achieved a mean Dice score of 0.534 across 11 anatomical structures, with better performance in commonly represented configurations (e.g., A2-P2, P1-A2-P3). Conclusion: ECHO-PREP demonstrates the feasibility of an integrated AI-assisted workflow for MR assessment, combining quality control, dynamic 4D valve quantification, and scallop-level anatomy interpretation. These results support the potential of AI to standardize M-TEER eligibility, reduce inter-observer variability, and provide decision support across centers with different levels of expertise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it