Towards standardizing mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with deep-learning algorithm: a comprehensive multi-model strategy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Severe mitral valve regurgitation requires comprehensive evaluation for optimal treatment. Initial screening uses transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), followed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to determine eligibility for adequate intervention. Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (M-TEER) indications are based on detailed and quality valve and sub-valvular apparatus assessment, including anatomy and regurgitation pathophysiology. Aim: To develop AI algorithms for standardizing M-TEER eligibility assessment using TTE and TEE echocardiograms, supporting all stages of mitral valve regurgitation evaluation to assist non-expert centers throughout the entire process, from severe mitral valve regurgitation diagnostic to M-TEER procedure. Methods: Three deep learning algorithms were developed using echocardiographic data from M-TEER patients performed at Montreal Heart Institute (2018-2025). 1. ECHO-PREP was trained to identify key diagnostic views in TTE (n = 530) and diagnostic and procedural views in TEE (n = 2,222) examinations to determine the level of quality images needed to do a M-TEER. 2. 4D TEE segmentation with automated mitral valve area (MVA) quantification (n = 221), and 3. 2D TEE scallop-level segmentation of leaflets and sub-valvular structures (n = 992). Results: Preliminary results on test sets showed 95.7% accuracy in TTE view classification and 91% accuracy for TEE view classification. The 4D segmentation module demonstrated excellent agreement with manual MVA measurements (R = 0.84, p < 0.001), successfully discriminating patients undergoing M-TEER from those referred for surgical replacement (p = 0.046 for AI predictions). The 2D scallop-level analysis achieved a mean Dice score of 0.534 across 11 anatomical structures, with better performance in commonly represented configurations (e.g., A2-P2, P1-A2-P3). Conclusion: ECHO-PREP demonstrates the feasibility of an integrated AI-assisted workflow for MR assessment, combining quality control, dynamic 4D valve quantification, and scallop-level anatomy interpretation. These results support the potential of AI to standardize M-TEER eligibility, reduce inter-observer variability, and provide decision support across centers with different levels of expertise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".