MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Aero-engine damage detection and location method based on the CerberusDet-LS multi-task model

2025· article· W4416677112 on OpenAlexaff
Shuyu Cai, Jie Fan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkloadKey (lock)Aviation accidentGeneralizationPrecision and recallPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intelligent detection of damage types and localization of damages in aero-engines can improve the problems of large workload and low detection efficiency in aero-engine borescope inspection, providing key technical support for ensuring aviation safety and improvement of operation and maintenance efficiency. Aiming at the problems of low efficiency and poor detection effect of the existing single-task models in handling multiple tasks respectively, an improved aero-engine damage detection and location method CerberusDet-LS based on the CerberusDet multi-task model is proposed. The LSKA module was added to the SPPF architecture of the original model to enhance the model’s recognition ability on multi-scale targets. The Spatially Enhanced Attention (SEAM) Module is integrated into the design of the detection head. The original structure of the detection head is modified to Detect_SEAM to achieve the effective detection of occluded objects. Finally, it is verified on the aero-engine damage dataset and the location dataset. The results show that, compared with the original model, the improved CerberusDet-LS model has increased the mean Average Precision (mAP) of the damage dataset and the location dataset by 2% and 0.3% respectively, and the recall rates (R) has increased by 1.8% and 1.4% respectively. It indicates that this algorithm has higher detection accuracy and stronger generalization ability, promoting the intelligent level of damage detection and location of aero-engines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207