MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhancing IoT Security via Optimized Dual Chain-Channel Device Identification and Attack Detection Scheme

2025· article· W4416677789 on OpenAlexaff
Ogobuchi Daniel Okey, Demóstenes Zegarra Rodríguez, Sajjad Dadkhah, João Henrique Kleinschmidt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Feature selectionIdentification (biology)Decision treeConvolutional neural networkInternet of ThingsFeature (linguistics)Feature extractionRandom forest

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a world of 8.2 billion people, there are more than 18 billion connected Internet of Things (IoT) devices in 2024. This massive adoption and application of IoT has increased security concerns due to their vulnerability to various cyberattacks. Identifying connected devices is a proactive measure to accurately provide high-level security. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel dual-purpose framework for simultaneous identification of IoT devices and attack detection. An improved Firefly Algorithm (FA) with Matthews-Correlation Coefficient (MCC)-based voting is applied for feature optimization. To achieve simultaneous device identification (DI) and attack detection (AD) functions, the ClassifierChain model integrates XGBoost (XGB), Random Forest (RF), and Decision Tree (DT) as metalearners. Additionally, a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1DCNN) with a dual output channel is implemented. FA optimizes feature selection to improve computational efficiency and model performance, while ClassifierChain enables multioutput classification to identify device types and detect attackspecific traffic flows. Experimental results in three (3) benchmark IoT datasets demonstrate superior accuracy, precision, and recall compared to traditional approaches. By precisely identifying IoT devices and simultaneously detecting the type of traffic flow, the proposed method offers robustness and improvement to the existing literature that handles these tasks independently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInternet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-votingFrench-language works237,207