Role of Polyamines in Mitigating Salinity Stress in Ornamental and Food Crops
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soil and irrigation salinity continue to have a major impact on the world's agriculture and horticulture, and loss of plant production is likely to worsen with global warming and climate change. Efforts to mitigate salinity stress and breed better salt-tolerant plants rely on our knowledge of plant response to abiotic stress at the physiological and molecular levels. Salinity usually leads to the accumulation of free and conjugated polyamines (PAs) in plant tissues. Putrescine (Put), and its derivatives spermine (Spm) and spermidine (Spd), perform critical functions by activating biochemical, physiological and molecular defense systems, thus reducing damage caused by salinity stress. Promoting endogenous levels of PAs can improve the salt tolerance of plants. Furthermore, the application of exogenous PAs has been shown to effectively mitigate salt stress across a range of commercially important plant species. This review critically examines the biosynthesis of PAs and their associated physiological, phytochemical, and molecular responses in plants under saline conditions. In addition, it evaluates the potential of PAs as a strategic tool for enhancing salinity tolerance. The review also highlights key gaps in current knowledge and proposes directions for future research to optimize the use of PAs in salinity stress management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".