Learning evoked centrality dynamics in the schizophrenia brain: entropy, heterogeneity, and inflexibility of brain networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: measures of centrality. We applied CD to functional MRI (fMRI) data in SCZ and Healthy Controls (HC) acquired during associative learning. METHODS: fMRI (3T Siemens Verio) was acquired in 88 participants (49 SCZ). Time series were extracted from 246 functionally defined cerebral nodes. We applied a dynamic windowing technique to estimate 280 partially overlapping connectomes (with 30 135 unique region-pairs per connectome). In each connectome, we calculated every node's Betweenness Centrality (BC) following which we built 246 unique time series from a node's BC in successive connectomes (where each such time series represents a node's CD). Next, in each group similarities in CD were used to cluster nodes. RESULTS: Clustering revealed fewer sub-networks in SCZ, and these sub-networks were formed by nodes with greater functional heterogeneity. The averaged CD of nodes in these sub-networks also showed greater Approximate Entropy (ApEn) (indicating greater stochasticity) but lower amplitude variability (suggesting less adaptability to task-induced dynamics). Finally, higher ApEn was associated with worse clinical symptoms and poorer task performance. LIMITATIONS: Centrality Dynamics is a new method for network discovery in health and schizophrenia. Further extensions to other task-driven and resting data in other psychiatric conditions will provide fuller understanding of its promise. CONCLUSION: The brain's functional connectome under task-driven conditions is not static. Characterizing these task-driven dynamics will provide new insight on the dysconnection syndrome that is schizophrenia. Centrality Dynamics provides novel characterization of task-induced changes in the brain's connectome and shows that in the schizophrenia brain, learning-evoked sub-network dynamics were (a) less responsive to learning evoked changes and (b) showed greater stochasticity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".