Prophylactic salbutamol use for pediatric exercise-induced bronchoconstriction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
QUESTION: An 8-year-old child was seen in our clinic for shortness of breath and wheezing after running at school. He was clinically healthy with no other symptoms consistent with asthma. His parents read that in adults, salbutamol could be taken before exercise to prevent shortness of breath and wheezing, but were unsure whether this also applied to children. Is salbutamol safe and effective for preventing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in pediatric patients? ANSWER: Effective management of EIB in children supports greater participation in physical activity, which is important for physical and emotional well-being. Pediatric studies found salbutamol is safe and effective for preventing EIB in children when administered 15 to 30 minutes before exercise. Children can develop a tolerance to salbutamol if used frequently; therefore, salbutamol should be used less than once per day to maintain effectiveness. If children require salbutamol more often, additional therapies to manage airway inflammation can be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".