MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416695487 · doi:10.11159/jffhmt.2025.035

Heat Transfer Enhancement through Thermal Dispersion in Hybrid Nanofluid Saturated Mixed Convection along a Horizontal Cone

2025· article· W4416695487 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nayema Islam Nima, Shahina Akter, Jahangir Alam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Flow Heat and Mass Transfer · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndependent University, Bangladesh
KeywordsNanofluidDispersion (optics)Heat transferThermalCombined forced and natural convectionCone (formal languages)Convection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores the influence of thermal dispersion on mixed convection flow of a hybrid nanofluid past a horizontal cone.The working fluid is ethylene glycol containing cylindrical alumina (AlO) and silica (SiO) nanoparticles in equal volume fractions.Compared with a single alumina-based nanofluid, the hybrid suspension exhibits significantly improved thermal transport capability.To analyze the problem, the governing nonlinear partial differential equations are reduced to ordinary differential equations using similarity transformations, and the resulting system is solved numerically with the Bvp4c method.The investigation shows that suction strongly enhances the heat transfer rate by reducing the thickness of the thermal boundary layer, while injection diminishes it, particularly under forced convection conditions.Thermal dispersion is found to decrease heat transfer efficiency by weakening the near-wall temperature gradient, with its impact being more pronounced in forced and mixed convection regions.In contrast, a higher Biot number consistently increases heat transfer, with stronger effects observed as the flow approaches free convection dominance.Overall, the results demonstrate that hybrid nanofluids, when coupled with optimized boundary conditions, can deliver substantial improvements in convective heat transfer performance.These findings underscore the potential application of such fluids in advanced cooling systems, heat exchangers, and energy-related technologies where efficient thermal regulation is critical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid Flow Heat and Mass TransferSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207