INTERNATIONAL LEGAL BASIS OF SECURITY COOPERATION OF UKRAINE: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction. The article analyzes the main approaches to the interpretation of the concept of "international treaty" and its legislative consolidation in the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On International Treaties". It is established that since the moment of Ukraine's independence, bilateral agreements have been signed, in particular with NATO, aimed at cooperation in the field of security and defense within the framework of the "Partnership for Peace" program. It is noted that after the start of the full-scale invasion, Ukraine concluded a number of bilateral security agreements, the provisions of which provide for the cooperation of our state with Italy, Canada, Great Britain and Northern Ireland, France, Denmark and Germany. It is determined that the provisions of all these bilateral security agreements, which were concluded between Ukraine and Western partners in 2024, provide for the provision of assistance in various areas, supporting our state in the process of full-fledged protection and restoration of territorial integrity, economic reconstruction and counteraction to Russian aggression. In addition, France, Germany, Denmark and Canada have expressed their readiness to provide macroeconomic and military financial support to Ukraine. Conclusion. The results of the analysis of bilateral security agreements between Ukraine, NATO and individual partner states have established the existence of a single and common aspiration of the international community to counter Russia's armed aggression, ensure peace and order both on the European continent and in the world as a whole. The conclusion of such agreements is a positive indicator for Ukraine in the field of international cooperation with foreign partners, and although these agreements require improvement, they serve as a basis for further formation of the international legal framework for security cooperation of Ukraine. In addition, Ukraine's active dialogue with foreign partners should ensure the unification of efforts to increase the defense capabilities of our state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".