Topical Spermidine Hyaluronate (Spd-HA) in Vulvovaginal Atrophy: A Preliminary Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), previously termed vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), is a prevalent hypoestrogenic condition characterized by genital, sexual, and urinary symptoms. Although hormonal therapies are effective, many women are unwilling or unsuitable to use them. Spermidine hyaluronate (Spd-HA) has been reported to be effective in the treatment of vulvodynia and is currently under investigation for stress urinary incontinence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Spd-HA gel on the signs and symptoms of GSM. Materials and Methods: Five postmenopausal women with GSM presenting with vulvovaginal atrophy were enrolled in this prospective, single-arm, pilot study. They applied Spd-HA gel locally for eight weeks (three times/week for the first 4 weeks, followed by two times/week for the next 4 weeks). Vulvovaginal signs and symptoms were assessed at baseline (V1), 4 weeks (V2), and 8 weeks (V3) using the most bothersome symptoms (MBS), vaginal health index (VHI), and maturation index (MI) and value (MV). Results: Spd-HA gel was associated with MBS score improvement from baseline to week 8 [from (5.00 ± 2.00) to (1.60 ± 1.52)]. VHI score and MI improved from baseline to week 8. Compared to literature data, improvement in MVs obtained in women who received Spd-HA was greater than those obtained by hydrating products, but lower than those observed in women with estrogen or prasterone therapy. Conclusions: This preliminary experience suggests that Spd-HA gel ameliorates the vulvovaginal component of GSM. It may represent a promising non-hormonal option for women with GSM who are unwilling or unsuitable to receive hormonal therapy, warranting confirmation in larger controlled trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".