MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416697451 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.23.690009

Direct Training of Networks of Morris-Lecar Neurons with Backprop

2025· preprint· W4416697451 on OpenAlex
Navid Akbari, K. O. Mason, Aaron J. Gruber, Wilten Nicola

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsSpiking neural networkArtificial neural networkBackpropagationProcess (computing)Feature (linguistics)Function (biology)ReplicateSubnetwork

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) have the potential to replicate the brain’s computational efficacy by explicitly incorporating action potentials or “spikes”, which is not a feature of most artificial neural networks. However, training SNNs is difficult due to the non-differentiable nature of the most common spiking models: integrate-and-fire neurons. This study investigates if some of the difficulty in training SNNs arises from the use of integrate-and-fire neurons, rather than smoother alternatives, like conductance-based neurons. To that end, we considered networks of Morris-Lecar (ML) neurons, a conductance-based neuron model which is differentiable. Networks were built using kinetic synaptic models that smoothly link presynaptic voltage dynamics directly to postsynaptic conductance changes, ensuring that all components remain fully differentiable. Switching to biophysically detailed models of synapses and neurons enabled direct end-to-end training through Backpropagation Through Time (BPTT). Biophysically detailed networks were successfully trained on image classification, regression, and time series prediction tasks. These results demonstrate the feasibility of employing biophysically detailed differentiable point neuron models to create SNNs that function as more accurate paradigms for the study of neural computations and learning. Further, this work confirms that some aspects of the difficulty in translating gradient-based learning algorithms from machine learning may arise from model choice, rather than SNNs being intrinsically difficult to train. 1. Author summary The brain’s information-processing efficiency arises in part from neurons communicating via discrete spikes. Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) mimic this process at the neuronal level but have been difficult to train as most machine learning algorithms are not directly applicable. Most SNNs use integrate-and-fire neurons, a modelling framework that simplifies spikes into non-differentiable, abrupt voltage changes, which makes them difficult to train with powerful, standard AI training methods that use derivatives to compute gradients (e.g. Backprop). In our work, we asked if this difficulty could be overcome by considering end-to-end differentiable spiking neural networks. We used completely differentiable SNNs using the Morris-Lecar neuron, a biophysically detailed neuron model that produces smooth spikes, along with differentiable kinetic synapses. With the entire network being mathematically differentiable, we found that we could train it directly using standard backpropagation through time on different tasks (regression, classification, and chaotic time series prediction). This work demonstrates that the use of integrate-and-fire models may be limiting applications of machine learning algorithms towards understanding how learning functions in the brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it