MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416704830 · doi:10.26868/25222708.2025.1275

Predictive and transactive controls for EVE park net-zero community with AI/ML models

2025· article· W4416704830 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Nourin Kadir, Alan S. Fung, Caroline Hachem-Vermette

Bibliographic record

VenueBuilding Simulation Conference proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsRenewable energyWind powerElectricityTransactive memoryWork (physics)Solar energyGovernment (linguistics)Energy (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A net-zero community is a development that balances the amount of energy consumed with the amount of energy generated on-site, resulting in a net-zero energy consumption. This typically involves integrating renewable energy sources, such as solar panels and/or wind turbines, along with energy-efficient building designs and technologies. The Government of Canada aims at net-zero emission by 2050. In alliance with this goal, EVE Park, the first community of its kind; a net-zero energy community is being developed in west London, Ontario. Currently the functional part of the community’s energy demand is coming from solar PV. This research work focuses on developing the AI/ML models for hourly, weekly and monthly forecasts based on the community generation and consumption data for predictive and transactive controls for the whole community. Deep learning models like RNN, LSTM and GRU are developed for this purpose. The goal is to minimize GHG emission, curb peak demand during peak hours, and reduce electricity costs. In future investigation wind energy and battery storage will be added with solar PV for further optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBuilding Simulation Conference proceedingsSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207